India

Vande Mataram not SIR debate first, Oppn livid

Rijiju underlined that a debate on Vande Mataram had already been cleared by the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) and would precede the broader discussion on electoral reforms.

Parvez Sultan

NEW DELHI: The confrontation between the government and the opposition in the Rajya Sabha showed no sign of easing on Tuesday, with the treasury benches making it clear that a debate on Vande Mataram would be taken up before any discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju’s refusal to reorder the agenda triggered fresh disruptions, forcing adjournments and eventually prompting an opposition walkout.

When the House reconvened post-lunch, Rijiju underlined that a debate on Vande Mataram had already been cleared by the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) and would precede the broader discussion on electoral reforms. “From the government side, we propose a discussion on further electoral reforms…when the government is ready to take up the discussion, please do not put the condition that it has to take precedence over other matters. In the first BAC meeting, the government had proposed a discussion on the 150th anniversary of the Vande Mataram, which is already listed,” he said, adding that time for other matters would be settled in the next BAC meeting.

Calling Vande Mataram “a matter related to our freedom struggle”, Rijiju said, “Considering that Opposition parties have united to raise one issue, the government is ready to take up a discussion, but to have it before discussion on Vande Mataram may not be appropriate.”

TMC leader Derek O’Brien immediately raised a point of order, arguing that the SIR concerns could not be delayed. “More than 14 opposition parties want a discussion on a particular issue because people are dying because of SIR,” he said, drawing sharp reactions across the aisle.

Tensions escalated further during an exchange between Chairperson CP Radhakrishnan and Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge, who objected to the rejection of Rule 267 notices without naming the MPs or subjects involved. Kharge said, “We have demanded a discussion under Rule 267… Rule 267 says all other issues should be kept aside and first preference should be given… Aside from all other businesses, the House should take up the Rule 267 discussion. You give us permission….”

DMK’s Tiruchi Siva and CPM’s John Brittas backed the demand, with Siva calling SIR “a very serious issue.”

BJP accuses Sonia Gandhi of objecting to full Vande Mataram rendition; Congress denies charge

Restoring J&K's special status, statehood essential to strengthen federalism: CM Omar Abdullah

PM Modi backs women’s quota, announces youth initiatives in Independence Day address

Mahua Moitra writes to LS Speaker over house eviction order, seeks safety and dignity for women MPs

BJP-RSS spreading hatred and dividing people, Congress opening ‘mohabbat ki dukaan’: AICC president Kharge

SCROLL FOR NEXT