Orissa High Court  (File Photo | Express)
Odisha

Orissa HC slams govt, OSMCL, for delay in emergency med equipment purchase

The court, however, remained unsatisfied with the lack of a specific mechanism for emergency procurement despite repeated directions.

Express News Service

CUTTACK: The Orissa High Court on Thursday came down heavily on the Odisha State Medical Corporation Ltd (OSMCL) and the Health and Family Welfare department for failing to detail emergency procurement procedures for medical equipment, despite earlier directions.

A two-judge bench of Justices SK Sahoo and V Narasingh, while hearing a PIL on the non-supply of medical equipment and instruments, noted with concern that both affidavits submitted, one by the Health secretary and another by the OSMCL, were conspicuously silent about such emergency procurement.

Taking note of the lapse, the bench directed the managing director of OSMCL to explore the possibility of adopting an expedited process of procurement in case of an emergency and file a detailed report outlining the same on the next date of hearing on November 27.

The affidavit filed by Health secretary Aswathy S described the standard procurement process involving multiple layers of approvals from institutional requisition to evaluation by the State Equipment Management Committee (SEMC) followed by the State-level Purchase Committee (SLPC) and eventual procurement by OSMCL. It, however, stressed that mere sending of the institutional requisition does not automatically guarantee procurement at the departmental level.

Dr. Amitabh Prusty, GM (Equipment), OSMCL, submitted an extensive affidavit detailing the six-nine month timeline required for normal procurement, citing technical specifications, tendering processes, evaluations and demonstrations.

The court, however, remained unsatisfied with the lack of a specific mechanism for emergency procurement despite repeated directions. In a meeting held on September 9 between OSMCL and SCBMCH officials, equipment priorities were reportedly finalised, with OSMCL stating, “Most of the equipment under process are already available in other departments... and patient care is not being hampered.”

“Although there was a specific direction by this Court to list the procurement process in case of an emergency, both affidavits are conspicuously silent,” the bench noted sternly.

LIVE | West Asia conflict: Iran war 'pretty much' over, says Trump

INTERVIEW | We stand guard over allies, not engaged in US-Israel strikes on Iran: NATO official Berti

70 years young: Shashi Tharoor brand lives on amid controversy as constant companion

Opposition parties set to move motion for removing CEC Gyanesh Kumar

G7 'not there yet' on release of oil reserves amid Mideast War: French finance minister

SCROLL FOR NEXT