Representational Image. 
Tamil Nadu

Register marriage between man and transwoman: Madurai Bench

The Court has also directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O. prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children. 

From our online archive

MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court ordered registration of marriage between a man and a transwoman from Thoothukudi following a petition seeking a direction to the authorities concerned to register their marriage. The Court has also directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O. prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children. 

The landmark judgment was passed on April 22 by Justice G R Swaminathan on a petition filed Arunkumar and Sreeja seeking direction to the Registration Department after the department ‘refused’ to register their marriage. The department stated that Sreeja, being a transwoman cannot be placed under the category of ‘bride’ as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and that the word ‘bride’ only refers to ‘woman’ on her wedding day.

However, Justice Swaminathan rejected the contentions by observing, “transgender persons who are neither male nor female fall within the expression ‘person’ and hence entitled to legal protection of laws in all spheres of State activity as enjoyed by any other citizen of this country”. Discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation or gender identity, therefore, impairs equality before the law, equal protection of the law and violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India, he added.

Referring to epics Ramayana and Mahabharata, he further held that the existence of a third category had been recognised even in the indigenous Hindu tradition. Hence the expression ‘bride’ occurring in Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, would have to include within its meaning not only a woman but also a transwoman, he stated and directed the authorities to register the marriage solemnised between the petitioners.

Pointing out that one of the petitioners Arun Kumar belonged to a scheduled caste, the Judge also recommended that they can avail financial incentive under Dr Ambedkar’s Scheme for Social Integration through Inter-Caste Marriages. Justice Swaminathan also noted that intersex children must be given time and space to find their true gender identity. “But the parents make the infant undergo sex reassignment surgery (SRS), without providing them the opportunity (to decide),” he stated and directed the Health Secretary to issue a G.O prohibiting sex reassignment surgery on intersex infants and children.

Trump speech on Iran war: When endgame talks meet mid-game reality

India attends UK-hosted summit on efforts to reopen Strait of Hormuz

CAG report flags Airtel delays in rural connectivity project, highlights BSNL mismanagement

Mamata condemns attack on judicial officers amid SC rap, says BJP 'plotting' unrest for President’s rule

Himachal Pradesh assembly passes bill denying pension for MLAs disqualified under anti-defection law

SCROLL FOR NEXT