Delhi High Court affirmed that WhatsApp chats are not admissible evidence. Image used for representation. 
Delhi

WhatsApp chats not admissible evidence: Delhi High Court

The observation was made by Justice Subramonium Prasad while addressing a plea from Dell International Services India Private Limited.

Shekhar Singh

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has affirmed that WhatsApp conversations cannot be considered admissible evidence without a proper certificate as mandated under the Evidence Act of 1872. The observation was made by Justice Subramonium Prasad while addressing a plea from Dell International Services India Private Limited.

Dell’s plea challenged an order from the Delhi State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission which had upheld a District Commission’s decision to reject Dell’s written statement. The statement was dismissed on the grounds of being filed post admissible period.

The case originated from a complaint lodged by Adeel Firoz against Dell in 2022. Dell had submitted a screenshot of a WhatsApp conversation between its representatives and Firoz, claiming it demonstrated that the complete complaint and annexures were not received by them.

Upholding this decision, Justice Prasad emphasised that the WhatsApp screenshot could not be considered valid evidence in a writ petition, saying, “In any event, the Whatsapp conversations cannot be read as evidence without there being a proper certificate as mandated under the Evidence Act, 1872.”

EC assures SC no prosecution for voters reapplying through Form 6 after SIR draft roll deletions

Another accused killed in West Bengal police encounter, fifth death in six months

‘Defaming India at international platforms will not help Rahul Gandhi come to power’: Amit Shah

Mamata-led TMC furnishes documents in EC battle over party control, alleges forged affidavits by rival groups

Ankita Bhandari case: Pulkit Arya’s father seeks probe into victim’s friend, questions SIT