Delhi High Court affirmed that WhatsApp chats are not admissible evidence. Image used for representation. 
Delhi

WhatsApp chats not admissible evidence: Delhi High Court

The observation was made by Justice Subramonium Prasad while addressing a plea from Dell International Services India Private Limited.

Shekhar Singh

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has affirmed that WhatsApp conversations cannot be considered admissible evidence without a proper certificate as mandated under the Evidence Act of 1872. The observation was made by Justice Subramonium Prasad while addressing a plea from Dell International Services India Private Limited.

Dell’s plea challenged an order from the Delhi State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission which had upheld a District Commission’s decision to reject Dell’s written statement. The statement was dismissed on the grounds of being filed post admissible period.

The case originated from a complaint lodged by Adeel Firoz against Dell in 2022. Dell had submitted a screenshot of a WhatsApp conversation between its representatives and Firoz, claiming it demonstrated that the complete complaint and annexures were not received by them.

Upholding this decision, Justice Prasad emphasised that the WhatsApp screenshot could not be considered valid evidence in a writ petition, saying, “In any event, the Whatsapp conversations cannot be read as evidence without there being a proper certificate as mandated under the Evidence Act, 1872.”

The real AI story of 2026 will be found in the boring, the mundane—and in China

Migration and mobility: Indians abroad grapple with being both necessary and disposable

Days after Bangladesh police's Meghalaya charge, Osman Hadi's alleged killer claims he is in Dubai

Post Operation Sindoor, Pakistan waging proxy war, has clear agenda to destabilise Punjab: DGP Yadav

Gig workers declare protest a success, say three lakh across India took part

SCROLL FOR NEXT