NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Monday extended the stay on further investigation into Law Minister Kapil Mishra’s alleged involvement in the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, pushing the next hearing date to May 7.
Special Judge Kaveri Baweja of the Rouse Avenue Court passed the order after being informed that the notice issued on April 9 to certain respondents had not been successfully served.
Earlier, on April 9, Judge Baweja had stayed the probe against Mishra till April 21, following an application filed by the minister challenging a magisterial court’s order. As part of that earlier hearing, the court had issued notices to Ilyas and other respondents, directing them to submit their responses by April 21. However, with the notices remaining undelivered, the matter has now been deferred further.
Senior advocate P K Dubey appeared on behalf of Kapil Mishra, while Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad represented the Delhi Police. Earlier, on April 1, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vaibhav Chaurasia had observed that there appeared to be a prima facie cognisable offence necessitating additional inquiry.
“It is evident that Mishra was present in the area during the period in question… a further investigation is warranted,” the magistrate had noted in his order. The Delhi Police, however, contested Ilyas’ request, maintaining that Mishra bore no responsibility for the outbreak of violence. The force reiterated that Mishra’s actions had already been scrutinised as part of the broader conspiracy probe into the riots.
According to police submissions, internal communications from the Delhi Protest Support Group suggested that road blockades, or chakka jams, had been premeditated, with planning documented as early as 15 and 17 February 2020.
Also in court
HC asks NIA response on PFI leader plea
The High Court on Monday asked the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to respond to OMA Salam, a leader of the banned Popular Front of India (PFI), request for a 15-day custody parole to travel to his hometown in Kerala for ceremonies following his daughter’s death. The NIA’s lawyer explained that Salam’s daughter had died a year ago and that they would provide a detailed reply. Salam challenged the trial court’s recent decision, which granted him just one day and six hours of custody parole.