File Photo of the Supreme Court premises. | PTI 
Nation

SYL row: Supreme Court to debate Punjab’s contention

In a strong message to Punjab, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said its verdict allowing construction of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal in Haryana and Punjab has to be implemented.

From our online archive

NEW DELHI: In a strong message to Punjab, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said its verdict allowing construction of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal in Haryana and Punjab has to be implemented.

The court, however, clarified that it would deliberate upon Punjab’s contention on whether the judgment of a five-judge Constitution Bench, which held its law unconstitutional, was binding.

A five-judge Bench, while answering the Presidential Reference on November 11, 2016, had held that the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 was unconstitutional as it negated the effect of the apex court judgments of 2002 and 2004.

Senior advocate R S Suri, appearing for Punjab, said the five-judge Bench verdict was not binding as it was given under its advisory jurisdiction and the Punjab law still stands.

Iran says it has 'necessary will' to end war, but seeking guarantees for lasting peace

China, Pakistan outline five-point plan to end US-Israel war on Iran

Is the NSS a factor in the upcoming Kerala elections? Or have they entirely lost their relevance?

Security for NC office in Srinagar withdrawn fortnight after assassination attempt on party chief

Rupee posts biggest annual decline in 14 years, tumbles 9.55% in FY26

SCROLL FOR NEXT