Former JNU student-turned-activist Sharjeel Imam. (File Photo | PTI)
Delhi

Delhi HC seeks police response on Sharjeel Imam’s bail plea in 2020 riots conspiracy case

A bench of Justices Prathiba M Singh and Vikas Mahajan issued notice on Imam’s appeal challenging the trial court’s July 4 order rejecting his second regular bail application.

TNIE online desk

The Delhi High Court on Friday sought the Delhi Police’s response on a bail plea filed by student activist Sharjeel Imam in a UAPA case linked to the alleged larger conspiracy behind the February 2020 northeast Delhi riots.

A bench of Justices Prathiba M Singh and Vikas Mahajan issued notice on Imam’s appeal challenging the trial court’s July 4 order rejecting his second regular bail application.

The court granted the police two weeks to file its reply and posted the matter for hearing on August 27.

Imam was arrested on August 25, 2020, and booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for allegedly being among the “masterminds” behind the riots that claimed 53 lives and injured more than 700 people.

The violence broke out in northeast Delhi in February 2020 during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, and the National Register of Citizens.

While dismissing Imam’s bail plea, the trial court said it had “no option but to follow” the Supreme Court’s January 5 order and could neither entertain the application nor grant relief.

The court also held that the bail plea was not maintainable before it.

In his appeal before the High Court, Imam argued that the trial court had erred by refusing to independently consider his regular bail plea. He also pointed out that even after nearly six years, the trial proceedings had not moved beyond the stage of arguments on charges.

On January 5, the Supreme Court had denied bail to Imam and Umar Khalid in the larger conspiracy case while granting relief to co-accused Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa Ur Rehman, Mohammad Saleem Khan and Shadab Ahmad.

A bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria had observed that there was a prima facie case against Khalid and Imam under the UAPA, adding that all accused could not be treated equally due to the “hierarchy of participation”.

(With inputs from PTI)

Two schoolchildren among three killed as train rams pool car at open level crossing in Bengal

‘Will stay alive till July 20 at any cost’: Wangchuk’s fast enters Day 20 amid health concerns

US bombing appears to cripple tower at Iran's key Chabahar port

'3 Idiots' not based on Sonam Wangchuk, says Aamir Khan; appeals for end to hunger strike

Kharge seeks all-party meet on ‘revised’ delimitation bill

SCROLL FOR NEXT