Image used for representational purpose only 
Delhi

Court raps lawyer for riding vehicle during hearing

Additional sessions judge Pulastya Pramachala was hearing a rioting case against Tahir Hussain and others which was at the stage of the defence cross-examining prosecution witnesses.

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday censured a lawyer for being “unprofessional” as he was seen “walking” and then “in a moving car” while appearing virtually on a cellphone in a February 2020 riots case.

Additional sessions judge Pulastya Pramachala was hearing a rioting case against Tahir Hussain and others which was at the stage of the defence cross-examining prosecution witnesses. “I do not find any kind of professionalism behind such conduct and submissions of Mehmood Pracha. This is another glaring misuse of video-conferencing, which has to be stopped,” said the judge.

Earlier in the hearing, advocate Sikander appeared for an accused Anas and said the main counsel Pracha would conduct a cross-examination in another case as the Supreme Court had directed day-to-day trial in the case. “He (Sikander) was already informed that just because that case has been directed to be taken up on a day-to-day trial basis, the responsibility of the counsel does not come to an end for this case. such a request is not entertainable,” the court said.

Why the additional declaration linked to Form 6 is facing a legal challenge

Four CISF personnel killed in firing by colleague after argument in J&K's Kathua

Different paths, same goal: The making of India’s golden quartet in 2026 Asian Games

INDIA bloc meeting on SIR: Joint agitation, Gyanesh Kumar removal notice on agenda

India rejects Turkish President Erdogan's 'unwarranted' Kashmir remark at UNGA