The Supreme Court  
India

Don't be under impression that case will be adjourned if you name senior advocate: Supreme Court

When the matter later came up for hearing, the court said it wants to dispel the impression that it can adjourn the matter in the name of the senior counsel.

PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday took strong objection to a lawyer seeking adjournment in a matter on grounds that a senior lawyer will argue the case.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan reprimanded the lawyer, who sought to defer the matter about a commercial dispute.

The lawyer asked the court to adjourn the matter for four weeks, saying senior advocate Harish Salve will argue the matter.

The lawyer said Salve was abroad and will argue the matter physically after his return.

"Are you under the impression that we will adjourn a matter if you take the name of a senior counsel? This tendency of the lawyers at the bar must stop. We are not going to adjourn matters just because you take the name of any senior counsel," the bench observed.

When the matter later came up for hearing, the court said it wants to dispel the impression that it can adjourn the matter in the name of the senior counsel.

However, it accepted the request and adjourned the hearing.

The apex court had earlier in January pulled up a lawyer addressing the court from his car and underscored the importance of maintaining dignity in legal proceedings.

BCI chair apologises over NALSAR ban order, says students 'don't require anyone to decide for them'

Jharkhand protest: Students to burn Soren and Rahul effigies, gherao CM's residence Aug 20

Tamil Nadu BJP chief's 'ask mother' jibe at CM Vijay triggers political backlash

SHANTI Act draft rules set operator liability, financial safeguards for private nuclear push

PoK would be protesting to reunite with J&K had Article 370 stayed: Omar Abdullah in I-Day speech

SCROLL FOR NEXT