Opinion

Textin is makin Eng a 4reign lang, LOL

Reading text speak, or txt spk, makes my eyes water as if hit by a jet of lemon juice.

From our online archive

Baroness Greenfield, the neuroscientist, is worried that sending text messages may cause young people to have shorter attention spans. If she’s right, of course, none of those young people will be aware of this, because she expressed her views in a newspaper article of several hundred words, some of them long, all of them spelt correctly, and none of them using digits as substitutes for whole syllables. All terribly old-fashioned and out-of-d8. So they won’t have read it.

In all probability, then, she’s preaching only to the converted. None the less, I’m right behind her. Admittedly, I’m not in the least qualified to comment on whether text messaging can cause mental disorders, or whether predictive text – the ability of your phone to guess what you’re going to say — will stunt your powers of self-expression, and make you less thoughtful and more error-prone. But I do know one thing. Reading text speak, or txt spk, makes my eyes water as if hit by a jet of lemon juice. And even if using text speak doesn’t reduce your attention span, it suggests that you’ve already got a pretty damn short one.

What is the excuse for it? I know that keeping messages below a certain character count can make them cheaper, but anyone who has ever received a text from a teenage relative will know that, if brevity was their aim, they wouldn’t insist on ending every sentence with a row of at least six exclamation marks. I still think what I do is better than inflicting such assaults on the English language as ‘ROFL’ (Rolling On Floor Laughing) or ‘BBFN’ (Bye Bye For Now) .

It’s not as if all these jaunty acronyms are universally understood. A lot of people seem to think that ‘LOL’ stands for Lots Of Love, rather than Laughing Out Loud. Which creates all kinds of potential for inadvertent offence. (‘Don’t B upset, babe — UR new hairdo looks gr8. LOL’.)

Language is in a constant state of evolution. Perhaps text speak will seem perfectly normal in 50 years’ time. Perhaps there’ll be a 21st-century edition of Shakespeare’s collected works featuring “2B/not 2B”, and the Oxford English Dictionary will define “2thless” and “1derment”. Perhaps misery memoirs will be written not in prose, but as a series of increasingly downcast emoticons.

‘Uninformed, in poor taste': India reacts strongly to Trump’s ‘hell hole’ remarks

Tamil Nadu, West Bengal phase-1 Assembly elections see record polling as voting concludes

Accessibility gaps mar polling experience for PwDs, elderly across Tamil Nadu

Bengal’s high voter turnout: Who stands to gain?

Gulf nations caught in trap of their own

SCROLL FOR NEXT