Andhra Pradesh High Court (Photo | Express)
Andhra Pradesh

Andhra High Court says judgment is a public document

The Bench observed that the judgment is a public document already in the public domain and, therefore, such a direction cannot be issued.

Express News Service

VIJAYAWADA: The Andhra Pradesh High Court has refused to restrain the public from referring to or using observations made by a single judge in a judgment that ordered an Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) inquiry into an alleged conspiracy to grab municipal land worth crores of rupees in Kakinada.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Lisa Gill and Justice Challa Gunaranjan rejected a request made by Special Government Pleader (SGP) Singamaneni Pranathi seeking directions to prevent anyone from using or circulating the observations made against her in the single judge’s verdict.

The Bench observed that the judgment is a public document already in the public domain and, therefore, such a direction cannot be issued.

However, the bench stayed, until the next hearing, the implementation of the adverse observations made against Pranathi in the single judge’s judgment and also stayed the ACB inquiry against her.

The matter has been posted for further hearing in the second week of August. The controversy relates to land donated to the Kakinada Municipal Corporation for public purposes. Private individuals claimed rights over the land.

Opposition closes ranks against CEC Gyanesh Kumar after report of dissent within poll panel

‘Vote chori’ a ‘direct attack on Constitution’, BJP, RSS, EC committed ‘treason’: Rahul Gandhi

IIT Bombay professor accused of alleged caste bias sent on leave to facilitate impartial probe into student's death

Two Election Commissioners objected to poll panel decisions 14 times in 10 months

Lifter Mirabai ends Asian Games drought, clinches 49kg silver