Image used for representational purpose only 
Delhi

Court raps lawyer for riding vehicle during hearing

Additional sessions judge Pulastya Pramachala was hearing a rioting case against Tahir Hussain and others which was at the stage of the defence cross-examining prosecution witnesses.

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday censured a lawyer for being “unprofessional” as he was seen “walking” and then “in a moving car” while appearing virtually on a cellphone in a February 2020 riots case.

Additional sessions judge Pulastya Pramachala was hearing a rioting case against Tahir Hussain and others which was at the stage of the defence cross-examining prosecution witnesses. “I do not find any kind of professionalism behind such conduct and submissions of Mehmood Pracha. This is another glaring misuse of video-conferencing, which has to be stopped,” said the judge.

Earlier in the hearing, advocate Sikander appeared for an accused Anas and said the main counsel Pracha would conduct a cross-examination in another case as the Supreme Court had directed day-to-day trial in the case. “He (Sikander) was already informed that just because that case has been directed to be taken up on a day-to-day trial basis, the responsibility of the counsel does not come to an end for this case. such a request is not entertainable,” the court said.

We are not dalaal nation like Pakistan: Centre at all-party meet on West Asia conflict

Trump warns Iran of 'hellfire' as West Asia war rages, Tehran sets own conditions

Assam BJP candidate named in suicide note dismisses it as ‘lies and propaganda’

BJP's seat expansion in TN faces limits as AIADMK boxes in its ally

'When Gujarat was burning, with whom were they sitting and eating dhokla': Owaisi's reply to TMC's 'B team' jibe

SCROLL FOR NEXT