Tejasvi Surya 
Karnataka

Karnataka High Court reserves verdict on PIL against gag order in Tejasvi Surya’s case

New Delhi-based Association for Democratic Reforms had filed a petition against the injunction order after a business woman tweeted against Tejasvi.

From our online archive

BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Thursday reserved the verdict on a public interest litigation questioning the injunction order passed by a city civil and sessions court restraining media from reporting defamatory statements with regard to Bengaluru South Constituency BJP candidate LS Tejasvi Surya.

Hearing the petition filed by New Delhi-based Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by Chairman Trilochan Sastry, against the injunction order dated March 29, 2019 after a business woman tweeted against him, the division bench of Acting Chief Justice L Narayana Swamy and Justice PS Dinesh Kumar reserved the verdict.

When court sought to know the impact of impugned order, the counsel of petitioner argued that the impugned order directly interfere with conducting elections. It will also have an impact on people who are suffering because lack of flow of information, he argued.  

Referring to a judgement of Supreme Court, he argued that “we are not arguing to allow someone to issue defamatory statements but to ask the Election Commission of India (ECI) to implement the rules. When the remedy is available by way of damage, injunction order cannot be passed”, he argued.

'If he can stop war, can't he stop paper leak?': CJP's Dipke says PM Modi must ensure Pradhan resigns

'TVK government may not survive even three months', claims DMK chief Stalin

23 parties set to attend INDIA bloc's 'janbandhan' meeting as Congress says alliance remains united

Gehlot says September 2022 incident was indication of disagreement against Sachin Pilot, not Congress leadership

Dalit men dragged through field, paraded semi-naked over allegations of phone theft in Punjab's Jharod

SCROLL FOR NEXT