Tejasvi Surya 
Karnataka

Karnataka High Court reserves verdict on PIL against gag order in Tejasvi Surya’s case

New Delhi-based Association for Democratic Reforms had filed a petition against the injunction order after a business woman tweeted against Tejasvi.

From our online archive

BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Thursday reserved the verdict on a public interest litigation questioning the injunction order passed by a city civil and sessions court restraining media from reporting defamatory statements with regard to Bengaluru South Constituency BJP candidate LS Tejasvi Surya.

Hearing the petition filed by New Delhi-based Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by Chairman Trilochan Sastry, against the injunction order dated March 29, 2019 after a business woman tweeted against him, the division bench of Acting Chief Justice L Narayana Swamy and Justice PS Dinesh Kumar reserved the verdict.

When court sought to know the impact of impugned order, the counsel of petitioner argued that the impugned order directly interfere with conducting elections. It will also have an impact on people who are suffering because lack of flow of information, he argued.  

Referring to a judgement of Supreme Court, he argued that “we are not arguing to allow someone to issue defamatory statements but to ask the Election Commission of India (ECI) to implement the rules. When the remedy is available by way of damage, injunction order cannot be passed”, he argued.

BRICS adopts New Delhi Declaration 2026

PM Modi calls for urgent UNSC reform, seeks greater Global South role in rule-making

BRICS reaches consensus on joint statement after marathon negotiations over West Asia conflict

BRICS: Congress says declarations of solidarity must be backed by consistent action

Strong India-UAE ties a ‘symbol of stability’ amid West Asia uncertainties, says PM Modi