A Division Bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justice Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, has sought a response from the state government on Sony's plea challenging the two orders issued by the Kerala High Court  Photo | Express
Kerala

Judicial officer moves SC against High Court’s disciplinary action

Sony said her probation was already delayed by several years and the penalty further affected her seniority and promotion prospects.

Express News Service

KOCHI: A judicial officer in Kerala has approached the Supreme Court challenging the disciplinary action initiated against her by the Kerala High Court for stopping the proceedings in 1,910 cases. The petitioner, Sony A S, who served as the Judicial First Class Magistrate III in Kollam from August 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 had allegedly disposed of 1,910 cases indiscriminately, without recording any reason.

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court consisting Justice Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta has sought a response from the state government on her plea challenging the two orders issued by Kerala High Court upholding the disciplinary penalty and rejecting her request to restore her seniority.

Sony A S, while serving as the JFCM in Kollam had invoked her powers under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to stop the proceedings in the cases involving minor offences like rash driving. The petitioner argued that the orders were passed in good faith to reduce the backlog in accordance with administrative directions encouraging magistrates to prioritise contested trials.

She said the Registrar of Kerala High Court had issued appreciation letters for reducing backlog. However, in September 2018, she was served a charge memo alleging deliberate disobedience of an office memorandum.

The disciplinary proceedings culminated in withholding two increments with cumulative effect in April 2022. Sony said her probation was already delayed by several years and the penalty further affected her seniority and promotion prospects.

She argued that the action was contrary to the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and the Kerala Judicial Officers Protection Act 1963, which safeguard the judges from disciplinary or civil action for acts done in good faith while discharging judicial functions.

Why the timing of the war against Iran is exceptionally brutal for India

Trump side-stepped diplomacy on his way to war in Iran. Now, he's asking China and others for help

'Biased characterization': MEA hits back at USCIRF report seeking sanctions on RSS, R&AW

LIVE | West Asia conflict: Trump chides allies over Hormuz mission as Israel launches Lebanon ground assault

Is BJP move to field Suvendu from Bhabanipur a bid to tie down Mamata to one constituency?

SCROLL FOR NEXT