Image used for representational purposes only. (Photo | ANI)
Odisha

Odisha High Court orders joint verification in violence over road to mines

It said the allegations concerning police action required examination after giving the state an opportunity to disclose the facts.

Express News Service

CUTTACK: The Orissa (Odisha) High Court has directed the Rayagada SP, DSP and sarpanchs of two villages to conduct a joint spot verification following allegations of police atrocities against tribal villagers during protests over construction of a road, at Sagabari village of the district.

A division bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Chittaranjan Dash issued the direction while hearing a PIL filed by Purushottam Hikaka and seven others, represented by advocate Anup Kumar Mohapatra.

The petitioners alleged that police personnel raided tribal households in the early hours of March 10, arrested 21 persons, including 10 women, and ransacked houses. They also alleged that several villagers were booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and lodged in Bhawanipatna jail.

The bench observed that while the PIL portrayed the incident as police atrocities against peaceful protesters, newspaper reports reflected versions from both sides. It said the allegations concerning police action required examination after giving the state an opportunity to disclose the facts.

The court directed the SP Rayagada, DSP and sarpanchs of Kantamal and Sagabari to undertake the joint spot verification and submit a report at the next hearing. It also directed the state to file an affidavit within three weeks.

It also instructed the police administration to ensure that no violence occurs in the adjoining villages and asked the petitioners to ensure that villagers do not take the law into their own hands. The matter has been posted for September 2.

The PIL, according to text of the high court order, alleged that police personnel headed by the IICs of Kashipur and Karlapat police stations broke open doors during house raids. It also highlighted the alleged detention and humiliation of a 19-year-old pregnant woman and three women who had infants with them, without communicating the reasons for their detention.

The petitioners sought a judicial probe by a sitting or retired high court judge or, alternatively, an SIT monitored by the court into the incidents including the alleged police action in the night of April 6 and all the past incidents related to the protest since 2023. They also sought compensation for victims and action against police personnel allegedly involved in the incidents.

Representing the state, counsel Saswat Das submitted that police had gone to the area to execute non-bailable warrants issued by competent courts. He said 58 police personnel were injured after villagers allegedly resisted the operation. He further submitted that police had subsequently refrained from entering the village and the situation in Kantamal and adjoining areas was peaceful. No road construction project was being undertaken in the area at present, he added.

CJI Kant invite row: BCI reverses course hours after halting enrolment of 2026 NALSAR graduates

INDIA bloc gives Speaker’s tea party a miss; DMK's Kanimozhi attends

Six workers dead, 14 injured after water floods tunnel in Uttarakhand’s Chamoli

Jharkhand protesters to hold ‘Tiranga Yatra’ on I-Day, refuse to end stir until demands met

Attack on Sukhbir Badal: The advocate-turned-gurdwara sewadar accused of wielding kirpan at SAD chief

SCROLL FOR NEXT