The strike went on for 37 days 
Tamil Nadu

Lost $100 mn due to 37-day worker strike, Samsung tells Madras HC

The strike, which went on for 37 days, ended after tripartite talks involving senior state ministers, workers’ representatives and officials of the company.

R Sivakumar

CHENNAI: Samsung India Electronics Private Limited on Tuesday said that it incurred a loss of $100 million because of the recent strike by the Samsung India Workers’ Union (SIWU), affiliated to the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU).

The strike, which went on for 37 days, ended after tripartite talks involving senior state ministers, workers’ representatives and officials of the company.

Senior counsel G Rajagopalan, appearing for Samsung, said this in the Madras High Court, while seeking to implead the company in the case already filed by SIWU praying for orders to the Tamil Nadu labour department to register their union.

Justice R N Manjula, who heard the petition, allowed the company to implead in the case, saying that it was in the interest of justice and to give an opportunity to the company to raise its objections and the trade union to place its counter-objections.

Rajagopalan submitted that Samsung cannot allow any political interference in the affairs of the company as the workers’ union is affiliated to CITU, which is in turn affiliated to the Communist Party of India (Marxist).

‘Workers have right to use firm’s name’

Rajagopalan also said the name ‘Samsung’ is a trade mark and cannot be used in the trade union’s name.

Advocate N G R Prasad, representing the union, objected to the petition, stating that the company need not be heard in the case because it only involves the union and the labour department.

Pointing out that the name of the company is used by the trade union in South Korea, the counsel, citing certain judgments, said that it is the right of the workers to establish the union in the name of the company in which they are working. Moreover, the union’s name must be registered by the labour department as per the Trade Union Act, Prasad said.

He said the union is simply using the company’s for the sake of union activities. It is not for business purposes, regulated by the Trade Mark Act, he added. The judge adjourned the case to November 11.

Congress, Rahul Gandhi are ‘B-team of BJP’, says Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan

AIADMK set to retain 170 seats in TN NDA; BJP, PMK, AMMK, TMC allocations near final

LIVE | West Asia war: US eases Iran oil sanctions to curb price shock as Trump hints at ‘winding down’ war

Ticket rebellions, SIR voter churn add volatility to Bengal poll race

Day after Centre confirms Indian killed in Riyadh missile strike, UP family says victim was their relative

SCROLL FOR NEXT