Nation

Not just Court's duty: Senior Adv. justifies Supreme Court's rejection of Menstrual leave petition

Express Video Service

The Supreme Court bench consisting of Justice Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi turned down a petition to make menstrual leave mandatory. They claimed that employers 'will not hire women if we make such a law'.

The bench also claimed that if the law is made mandatory, it will create a psychological fear that women are 'less' than men and that menstruation is something 'bad' happening to them."

In 2013 the Kerala government had granted menstrual leave for women students in all state-run universities and Karnataka government had also implemented a law for menstrual leaves at the workplace. so why doesn't the supreme court recognize it? We interviewed Senior Advocate Vibha Dutta Makhija who shared her analysis of the Supreme Court's stance on the issue.

Iran indicates safe Hormuz passage; EAM Jaishankar, Araghchi discuss BRICS cooperation as war intensifies

LIVE | West Asia conflict: Trump says US 'totally obliterated' Iran's Kharg Island, threatens its oil infrastructure

The Himalayan Orpheus: How Nepali hip-hop broke the musical chairs of power

West Asia crisis hammers D-Street: Rs 39 lakh crore evaporates in two weeks

IndiGo introduces fuel surcharge between Rs 399 and Rs 2,300, ticket prices set to go up

SCROLL FOR NEXT