Uttar Pradesh Health Minister Siddharth Nath Singh (File | PTI) 
Vijayawada

‘Legislative, executive decentralisation not acceptable’: Siddharth Nath Singh

Citing the example of Uttar Pradesh, he added that the State, with 23 crore people, has one capital -- Lucknow -- which was working ‘very well’.

From our online archive

VIJAYAWADA:  Uttar Pradesh minister and former in charge of BJP Andhra Pradesh Siddharth Nath Singh has opined that decentralisation of executive and legislative functioning, as being proposed by the YSRC government, is not acceptable.

Citing the example of Uttar Pradesh, he added that the State, with 23 crore people, has one capital -- Lucknow -- which was working ‘very well’.

Replying to a query at a press meet here on Wednesday, the MSME, Investment and Textile Minister of UP said, “We are 75 districts with 23 crore people. We are working very well from one capital, Lucknow. Decentralisation is a concept of power not of legislative and executive bodies.

"From my experience, you can’t decentralise them. They need to be together to work. The accepted formula of decentralisation is where regulatory/executive bodies are established at district-level, depending on the need of that particular district. The body can take care of the issues there so that people don’t need to come to the State body. This is an accepted formula, but not executive and legislative decentralisation.” 

Meanwhile, BJP leaders staged a protest at Dharna Chowk in Vijayawada against the government’s proposal to relocate the executive capital to Visakhapatnam.

Demanding that Amaravati be developed as proposed, the BJP leaders sat on a 24-hour-long hunger strike from 11.30 am. 

Is Akhilesh Yadav adopting ‘soft Hindutva’ ahead of 2027 poll battle?

Visas a 'sovereign' matter, says MEA as Tharoor alleges 115 Bharat Summit speakers barred

Bessent blames Lutnick's Commerce Department for not restricting Nvidia chips to China

What IAF's Gajraj landing at Nyoma, the border with China, means

India joins 50 nations in call for ‘safe, sustained and unhindered’ humanitarian aid access to Gaza