File Photo of the Supreme Court premises. | PTI 
India

SYL row: Supreme Court to debate Punjab’s contention

In a strong message to Punjab, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said its verdict allowing construction of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal in Haryana and Punjab has to be implemented.

From our online archive

NEW DELHI: In a strong message to Punjab, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said its verdict allowing construction of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal in Haryana and Punjab has to be implemented.

The court, however, clarified that it would deliberate upon Punjab’s contention on whether the judgment of a five-judge Constitution Bench, which held its law unconstitutional, was binding.

A five-judge Bench, while answering the Presidential Reference on November 11, 2016, had held that the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 was unconstitutional as it negated the effect of the apex court judgments of 2002 and 2004.

Senior advocate R S Suri, appearing for Punjab, said the five-judge Bench verdict was not binding as it was given under its advisory jurisdiction and the Punjab law still stands.

Why the additional declaration linked to Form 6 is facing a legal challenge

Top LeT terrorist killed in Budgam encounter; Army says operation still underway

Four CISF personnel killed in firing by colleague after argument in J&K's Kathua

INDIA bloc meeting on SIR: Joint agitation, Gyanesh Kumar removal notice on agenda

Different paths, same goal: The making of India’s golden quartet in 2026 Asian Games