Polavaram-Banakacherla Link Project. (File Photo)
Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh firm on Polavaram–Banakacherla link project at Jal Shakti meet

Andhra Pradesh clarified that the scheme was designed only to utilise surplus floodwaters that would otherwise flow into the sea, after upper riparian states had already drawn their share.

S Guru Srikanth

VIJAYAWADA: The first meeting of the inter-state water disputes committee between Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, chaired by the Central Water Commission (CWC) chairman, concluded today with Andhra Pradesh taking a firm stance on the Polavaram–Banakacherla link project (Nalamallasagar project).

Sources said that during the deliberations, CWC officials presented the agenda submitted by Andhra Pradesh in the form of a detailed presentation.

Telangana, however, had not submitted any agenda, and the CWC chairman asked its representatives to explain their position directly. Telangana officials questioned how permissions could be granted for diverting floodwaters from Polavaram to the Banakacharla project.

Andhra Pradesh clarified that the scheme was designed only to utilise surplus floodwaters that would otherwise flow into the sea, after upper riparian states had already drawn their share.

The CWC chairman supported this view, asking Telangana representatives what objection could exist if Andhra Pradesh used waters that would otherwise go to waste.

Officials from Andhra Pradesh further pointed out that when permissions were granted for projects like Kaleshwaram and Seetharama Sagar without AP’s consent, no disputes were raised, and questioned why objections were surfacing now over Banakacharla.

It was reiterated that the scheme involves only 200 TMC of surplus floodwaters, causing no harm to upper states, and urged the CWC to issue clear guidelines on the distribution of surplus waters in both the Krishna and Godavari rivers.

Officials who attended the meeting shared that Telangana pressed for Krishna river waters to be shared equally in a 50:50 ratio instead of the current 66:34 ad hoc arrangement.

They said they had rejected this demand, stating it was contrary to the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal (KWDT) award and Apex Council decisions, and therefore not feasible.

BJP accuses Sonia Gandhi of objecting to full Vande Mataram rendition; Congress denies charge

PM Modi backs women’s quota, announces youth initiatives in Independence Day address

Mahua Moitra writes to LS Speaker over house eviction order, seeks safety and dignity for women MPs

Congress hits back at Modi over ‘dimaagi Naxals’ remark, calls it a sign of desperation

Iran fires back at Trump's threat to declare Hormuz a US territory

SCROLL FOR NEXT