Madras High Court (File photo | EPS) 
Tamil Nadu

Right to practise religion can take backseat when right to life is under threat, says Madras HC

The court refused to entertain a petition that sought full reopening of temples that were shut due to the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions

Harish Murali

CHENNAI: The right to practise religion is certainly subservient to the right to life and when the right to life is threatened, the right to practise religion can take a backseat, the Madras High Court observed on Friday. It refused to entertain a petition that sought full reopening of temples that were shut due to the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions.

The bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy was hearing the petition filed by KK Ramesh. The petitioner had also sought complete resumption of bus services in all districts of the state.

The bench disposed of the plea and observed, "... such a matter would be left to the state to obtain relevant data and expert advice before imposing restrictions or easing them. There does not appear to be any arbitrary action on the part of the state for the court to interfere in the matter."

The court said "baby steps" are being taken to return to normalcy and it is better to err on the side of caution than to open up everything and be caught unawares as the country was when the second wave of COVID-19 struck earlier this year.

Assam’s demography changed under Congress, Modi trying to reverse trend: Amit Shah urges third term for BJP

Confident Group chairman C J Roy dies by suicide at Bengaluru office

Need to fill deputy CM post soon after speaking to Pawar family: Praful Patel after meeting Fadnavis

Shashi Tharoor asserts his positions on sensitive matters are pro-India, not aligned with BJP

'Believing' Alcaraz outlasts Zverev in epic to reach maiden Australian Open final

SCROLL FOR NEXT