Madras High Court (Photo | D Sampath Kumar, EPS) 
Chennai

Madras High Court Advocates Association challenges suspension of lawyers

The Association made a mention to this effect before Chief Justice VK Tahilramani and sought to declare the suspension notice illegal and invalid.

From our online archive

CHENNAI: THE Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA) has moved the Madras High Court challenging the order of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, suspending as many as 5,970 advocates from practice, on the ground that they did not pay the subscription fees under the Advocates Welfare Fund.

The Association, represented by its president G Mohanakrishnan and secretary R Krishnakumar, made a mention to this effect before the first bench headed by Chief Justice VK Tahilramani on Monday morning and the CJ permitted them to file the petition, which will be heard by the portfolio judge Justice N Kirubakaran, now stationed at Madurai Bench, through video-conferencing.

The petitioner association sought to declare Rule 42 of the Bar Council of India Rules (Chapter-II) and the suspension notice dated March 22 last, as invalid and illegal.

The petitioner contended that the membership to the Advocates Welfare Fund is voluntary and non-payment of the fee or subscription would entail only loss of the benefits under the scheme. Suspending from practice is unethical to the nature of the scheme. Moreover, no prior notice was issued to the defaulting advocates, the association contended.

India reels under severe heatwave; 98 of world’s hottest cities recorded in country

'Maha Jungle Raj' destroyed Bengal’s culture: PM Modi slams TMC

Are people of Bengal terrorists: Kejriwal questions deployment of security forces during Assembly polls

Gujarat local body polls see under 50% turnout in civic corporations amid heatwave

AAP moves disqualification plea against 7 MPs post-defection, rejects claims of BJP contact with Punjab MLAs

SCROLL FOR NEXT