Chennai

I-T dept withdraws 1,072 appeals from HC, appellate tribunals

The cases were dismissed on the basis of a recent circular issued by CBDT on August 8, 2019, raising the threshold for filing cases in ITAT from `20 lakh to `50 lakh, retrospectively.

C Shivakumar

CHENNAI: The Income Tax department of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry has withdrawn 1,072 appeal cases from Madras High Court and Income Tax appellate tribunals (ITAT) after Central Board of Direct Taxes issued a circular raising the threshold of filing cases in ITAT, High Court and Supreme Court.

The cases were dismissed on the basis of a recent circular issued by CBDT on August 8, 2019, raising the threshold for filing cases in ITAT from `20 lakh to `50 lakh, retrospectively. Similarly, in high courts, the limit has been doubled to `1 crore and in case of Supreme Court, the revised limit for filing appeal has been increased from `1 crore to `2 crore.

The entire exercise of withdrawal of cases, on the basis of an order issued on August 8 for enhancement of monetary limits for filing of appeals in tribunals (ITAT) and courts (HC and Supreme Court), is stipulated to be completed by October. The Income Tax department sources told Express that Tamil Nadu has four benches and all are situated in  Chennai and cater to the entire Tamil Nadu and Puducherry region. The number of department appeals pending before ITAT benches and High Court is approximately 1565 and 4,187, respectively.

“We have withdrawn 1,072 cases and these include 716 from High Court and 356 from ITAT. We have also identified 52 cases for withdrawal from Supreme court wherein the office in New Delhi has to take the call,” officials said.

This comes after the PMO sought an update from the CBDT about the number of appeals it has withdrawn from various courts. The issue of litigation between the tax department and the taxpayers is being constantly monitored by the PMO.

Sources said the revised limits will help “to reduce taxpayer grievances and help the department focus on litigation involving complex legal issues and high tax effect.” It will help in time, effort and resources to focus on litigation of substantial value.

‘Peace not weakness’; armed forces free to respond to threats: Rajnath Singh

Delhi building collapse: High Court orders citywide PG audit; holds MCD, DU too responsible tragedy

'Enough is enough': Calcutta HC grants interim protection to Abhishek Banerjee in three FIRs

TMC slams Bengal govt over ‘11-armed’ Durga image in ad; CM Suvendu apologises

Delhi building collapse: Rescue operation ends after 27 hours, no fresh casualties