Sabarimala temple 
India

Sabarimala women's entry: Over to five-judge constitution bench

The apex court have ref­e­r­red to a constitution bench the iss­u­e relating to the ban on entry of wo­m­en aged between 10 and 50 years to Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple.

From our online archive

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday ref­e­r­red to a constitution bench the iss­u­e relating to the ban on entry of wo­m­en aged between 10 and 50 years to Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple and framed five questions for the bench to look at.

The questions, drawn up by a b­e­n­ch headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, will decide whether the rights of women, especially their fundame­n­tal right to religious freedom and to pray at a place of their choice, can be infringed upon by the temple mana­g­ed by the Travancore Devaswom Bo­ard.

The management of the Sabarim­al­a temple had told the apex court that the ban was because women bet­ween 10 and 50 years cannot mainta­in purity during men­­s­t­r­u­a­t­i­o­n. The Travancore Dewaswom Bo­a­r­d justified the restriction on the gr­ounds that the deity, Lord Ayyapa, was a celibate.

It said that a 1,0­00-year-old custom and religious pr­actice could not be interfered with. The Kerala government had told the court that women of all ages should be allowed entry into the Sabarimala Ayyappa temple without any restriction.

Is Akhilesh Yadav adopting ‘soft Hindutva’ ahead of 2027 poll battle?

Visas a 'sovereign' matter, says MEA as Tharoor alleges 115 Bharat Summit speakers barred

Bessent blames Lutnick's Commerce Department for not restricting Nvidia chips to China

What IAF's Gajraj landing at Nyoma, the border with China, means

India joins 50 nations in call for ‘safe, sustained and unhindered’ humanitarian aid access to Gaza