Supreme Court (File Photo)
Nation

'171 Incidents are alarming': SC to Assam on police encounters, seeks details

The court observed that such petitions, challenging these police encounters, "could not be brushed aside as premature."

Suchitra Kalyan Mohanty

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed concern over 171 police encounters in Assam from May 2021 to August 2022, describing the issue as "very serious."

The court observed that such petitions, challenging these police encounters, "could not be brushed aside as premature."

A two-judge bench, comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, sought detailed information from the Assam government on the investigations conducted into these encounters.

"It is a very, very serious issue. 171 incidents are alarming," remarked the concerned apex court during the hearing.

The bench was hearing an appeal filed by petitioner Arif Md Yeasin Jwadder, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, challenging a January 2023 order of the Gauhati High Court that had dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) addressing these encounters by the Assam Police.

During the proceedings, Bhushan contended that the Assam Police had not adhered to the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in its 2014 judgement regarding the procedure for investigating police encounters. He pointed out that a large number of such encounters had taken place in Assam during the stated period.

The Gauhati High Court, while rejecting the PIL, in its order had referred to an affidavit filed before it by the Assam government which said 171 incidents had taken place from May 2021 till August 2022 in which 56 people died, including four in custody, and 145 were injured.

On Tuesday, the counsel for Assam informed the Supreme Court that the high court had dismissed the PIL, deeming it "premature." However, the apex court observed, "Petitions like this can't be brushed aside as premature."

Bhushan further argued that both the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the Assam Human Rights Commission had failed to discharge their duties and that due process of law had not been followed in these cases.

The Supreme Court, addressing the NHRC's role, remarked, "In civil liberty matters, the Supreme Court expects you [NHRC] to be at the forefront."

Clarifying that the case was not adversarial litigation, the apex court acknowledged the sensitivity of the matter and Assam's geographical location. It fixed the next hearing for November 26.

The petitioner had earlier argued before the high court that over 80 "fake encounters" were conducted by Assam Police between May 2021 and August 2022, leading to 28 deaths. The plea noted, "It is sad that many people killed or injured were not dreaded criminals," and called for an independent investigation by the CBI, SIT, or a police team from another state under the court's supervision.

Trump says Iran would be 'wiped off the earth' over assassination plot

Bangladesh will not back down to 'coercion' in India T20 World Cup row

Sunita Williams calls India ‘home’, highlights race to build a sustainable human presence on the Moon

Dhinakaran-led AMMK returns to NDA fold, Piyush Goyal welcomes leader

Sabarimala gold loss case: Kerala court grants bail to prime accused Unnikrishnan Potty

SCROLL FOR NEXT